Showing posts with label Deficit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deficit. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

World markets are discounting that something big will happen

===================
For my latest musings - please visit www.scottreeve.com
===================


This is my take on the world economy - Preserve your wealth while you still can!

The current talk is that the US and Europe may go back into recession. The reality is that they never left recession that hit in 2008. Bogus diluted statistics, such as inflation, unemployment rates have falsely portrayed the economic reality being felt by individuals in towns and cities around the world. Arguably many cities have been in depression for the last decade (look at Detroit and parts of Europe). The world economy is now on a detox diet and it will take many years, if not decades, to clean it up.

The markets are currently discounting that something very, very big is soon to happen. The markets always do this long before the average man on the street and the media realise it.

It could be a combination of things:
*country default;
* Euro monetary changes (Greece is insolvent, and other countries are close behind);
* central bank quantitative easing (monetising debt);
* major bank failure (particularly in Europe); and
* a significant slowdown in China.

All of these things are very real and we are already seeing the effects of this on world markets.


European contagion

All the major Euro countries are so intertwined lending billions to each other. A contagion will quickly spread when more of the bad debts rise to the surface.

Most of the current Euro-cris discussion is centred around Greece. By many measures its economy looks quite sick. It's sharemarket is now at its lowest level in 18 years (This is debt implosion!).

On other measures it certainly doesn't look as bad as other countries. Greece doesn't have the largest amount of government or private debts in the world, or the highest debt-to-GDP. One big difference is that it owes a much higher per cent of its debt to foreign creditors (foreign banks and countries).

Many argue that its non-sovereign entities which are clamping down on Greece. ie. the Global banking cartel led by the IMF, the World Bank, the Federal Reserve etc working in tune with the credit rating agencies (Moodys, S&P, Fitch). All I ask is what is the interests of the global banking groups? All actions to date show that they put their interests and survival ahead of everyone else. They do not care about the sovereignty of nation states.

So which countries banks' have the most at stake with Greece?

The following interactive chart I put together uses Bank for International Settlements data demonstrating which countries banks are most exposed to sovereign Greek debt as of the first quarter ending March 31 2011.

The most exposured banks are (by country):
French banks US$56.9 bn;
German banks US$23.8 bn;
UK banks US$14.7 bn;

The most exposed individual banks are:
BNP Paribas with US$7.1 bn (France)
Dexia with US$4.8 (Belgium)
Société Généralewith US$3.8 (France)

This is just the banks. When you add Government's holding Greek debt the amount is another US$145 bn.

Chart : There has been a huge widening of bony yield spreads and risk insurance on credit default swaps. Greece has gone parabolic. Portugal and Ireland are where Greece was a year ago.

or as Alan Kohler puts it, when the financial crisis hit last time in 2008, it was about liquidity (banks wouldn't lend to one another). This time around its about insolvency. There is plenty of cash around, but the banks might be broke.

Chart:
source: Alan Kohler, ABC News, Sept 2011

The dominoes are lined up

The next graph shows why the banking system is trying to fix Greece before it sets a precedent. You may have heard that Spain and Italy are "too big to fail, too big to bail". Europe bank exposure to Spain and Italy's are 6 to 7 times worse than Greece.

Chart :

The harsh reality is that no industry should be bailed out, including the banks from country to country. The ongoing debt crisis has come about because banks have lended and taken billion dollar bets to keep this unsound monetary system going (which is based on nothing but paper money generated out of nothing).

Monetary systems do blow up - why is the Euro any different?

One article I came across discuses that country default is more common than we are led to believe. There were a number of large defaults in the 1980s and 1990s in emerging countries across the Americas and eastern Europe. Economist Carmen Reinhart states that the list of deadbeat countries included
"current investor favorites like Brazil, which defaulted in 1983, went through a bout of hyperinflation in 1990 and effectively defaulted again, for the same reason, in 2000"

Reinhart and Professor Rogoff show that, on average, nations add 86% to their debt loads within three years of a credit crisis. At the same time, government revenue falls an average of 2% in the second year after the onset of the troubles. The way things are heading Greece and other Euro countries are heading down this path. Debts need to be rolled over...just like...a few snow flakes can lead to an avalanche.

The Stumble Cycle

Sovereign defaults--when a country stops paying its bills--go in waves, often following global financial crises, wars or the boom-bust cycles of commodities. Some countries, like Spain and Austria, mend their ways; others, like Argentina, are repeat offenders.

Chart :

The combination can be fatal for investors holding bonds issued by financially shaky countries like Argentina or Greece, which sell a lot of their debt outside their own borders (as does the U.S.--45% of all publicly held debt). As a nation's finances deteriorate, foreign investors sell their bonds, putting upward pressure on interest rates. That usually sets off a spiral including a deteriorating currency, which, if the bonds are denominated in foreign currencies, makes it impossible for the country to pay its debt. Greece doesn't have to worry about this last syndrome, because it uses the euro. But that might make things worse since it can't print its way out of its financial difficulties. "It's like entering a prize fight with one hand tied behind your back," Bass says. Argentina takes a different tack. Still struggling in the wake of its 2002 default on foreign-held debt, its president recently tried, and failed, to seize central-bank dollar deposits (and cashier her central banker) in order to repay overseas debt.



France

Following from earlier discussion, the big questions are which of the big European banks will go under first. The largest French banks, Credit Agricole and Societe Generale have billions in exposure to Greece and other Euro countries.

Chart : The share prices of the 3 largest French banks have fallen 73%, 87% and 87% since start the debt crisis started in 2008.



Italy

Until recently UniCredit was the largest bank in Italy by market capitalisation and a major euro-zone bank. It owns other large banks in Germany, Austria, and Poland with around 40 million customers all up. As the following charts shows, the market is dumping the two largest Italian banks. UniCredit is one of the "too big to fail and bail" euro banks and many of its depositors lie outside Italy, making and bail out practically impossible.

An ironic twist to this is that, UniCredit's predecessor was a bank called
Credit-Anstalt. This bank collapsed in 1931 which lead to a contagion which took Europe off the gold standard and pro-longed the Great Depression. Few people remain from the last depression era. Perhaps the money lessons need to be relearn?

Chart :



Australian dollar

The Australian dollar is a proxy for commodity prices and ultimately China. The Australian dollar has recently fallen sharply to 97 cents and has hit a major support level. If this fails there is another major support level at 94 cents.

Chart: The Australian dollar managed to bounce off the firs support level at US$0.97



Commodities

Overall commodity prices are not showing that China is in immediate trouble. Base metals: copper, zinc, nickel, lead etc are not in a major bear market yet. This may mean that the current correction will be short lived. If base metals start free falling and other negative signs come from China (popping of housing bubble?), than the Australian dollar and commodity prices will fall a lot (a huge amount) further.

Gold

Meanwhile, gold and silver have recently experienced a significant correction. Chart wise (USD/gold), gold's correction is not unhealthy. Gold was sitting at 11 year bull-market resistance line and its trending support line is about US$1550.

Chart:


As I posted recently, I believe the gold demand is getting stronger, and will remain strong, despite the recent price volatility. Since that post it has been reported that Mexico, Russia, South Korea and Thailand have all made large purchases in 2011 and globally, central banks are set to buy more gold this year than at any time since the collapse of the Bretton Woods system 40 years ago. The IMF even reported that European Central banks have started accumulating small quantities of gold after selling on average 400 tonnes of gold a year since 1999.

Silver

Silver plummeted last week by 34 per cent within trading days. It went straight through two key support levels and bounced back above them. After hitting a low of US$26.03, silver rebounded 28 per cent in 28 hours.

Chart: Silver fell 34 percent within 4 trading days, then bounced 28 percent within 28 hours


Is this volatility unusual? Silver is a very small market and historically has been prone to major corrections. My research shows that the major corrections in the last few years has lead to an increase in demand for physical silver (from mints and bullion dealers). I believe this will happen again.

Australia

Take away mining and Australia is in recession, and as I stated early, the key to the Australian economy is whether China can keep its economy upright. If it shows signs of weakness, commodity prices will collapse (along with oil, gold and silver) and the Australian Dollar will fall 10 or 20 cents against the USD.

China kept the world economy somewhat afloat during the global financial crisis, and is the sole reason why Australia didn't go and stay into a technical recession. One of the key barometers on the health of China is commodity prices.

Tourism has been in recession for many years now, in part to the high Australian dollar and a tightening of consumer belts.

Manufacturing has largely been in recession for a number of years except for businesses with astute management and niche business models.

Manufacturing insolvencies growing

Despite insolvencies around the world dropping to their lowest levels in nearly four years, Australia is headed in the opposite direction. This year is shaping up to be a record one for business failures on a par with troubled Eurozone countries. The most recent D&B Global Insolvency Index, ranking business failures in more than 30 key economies, found Australia's insolvency rate was on a par with indebted countries such as Italy, Spain and Hungary. Australia recorded a 12.1 per cent increase in business failures in the June quarter compared with falls elsewhere in the world of 5.7 per cent. D&B said its findings tied in with Australian Securities and Investments Commission data which pegged 2011 as a record year for insolvencies.

Business failures in manufacturing have soared 60 per cent in three years. Almost 300 manufacturing firms went broke in the first six months of this year, the business analyst Dun & Bradstreet says, and just 14 new manufacturers started up. By contrast, in 2008, 974 new manufacturers got off the ground, and only 392 folded.

Retail

Retail is finally entering recession. This has long been coming, even though the likes of Westfield (and other groups) have been creating mega-shopping centres around Australia. The whole retail industry relies on ever increasing amounts of debt (more credit cards and increasing consumption). This model is dead, and there is currently too much competition in Australia alone (before you look at internet shopping of overseas products on eBay and the like). Take electronics, there are so many major stores competing on price, and margins are getting thinner. Many of the private equity firms which bought up a lot of the retailers in recent years have failed, as over-inflated sales targets have missed the mark. In the last 12 months several major groups have entered administration: REDGroup (Borders/Angus and Robertson bookstores); Colorado Group (Jag, and shoe shops), Allied Brands (Baskin Robbins, Cookie Man), Krispy Kreme doughnuts, and Starbucks Australia. Most recently sharper falls in consumer spending has forced Harvey Normany to scrap its Clive Peeters and Rick Hart brands (7 stores to close) and David Jones announcing a 10.3% drop in fourth quarter sales and now expects a small profit for the new financial year.

Sizeable retrenchments are coming.


Housing

Chart:


Lastly, this is a very good presentation by Mike Maloney


Cheers
~ Scott

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Automatic Teller Man

Stimulus Package Attempt #2

Yesterday the Australian Government released details of a second stimulus package to the tune of A$42 billion dollars.

Summary:
• $14.7b for schools - $200,000 each
• $6.6b for 20,000 new homes
• $3.9b to insulate 2.7m homes
• $890m for road repairs and infrastructure
• $2.7b small business tax break
• $12.7b for cash bonuses of up to $950

Kevin Rudd – the human ATM
First there was FuelWatch, then FoodWatch - now introducing... ATM-Watch!

Kevin's criteria to stimulate the economy:

Criteria #1: You must be an Australian Citizen
* REWARD: $950 per person (cause you should feel good about being an Aussie!)
Cost: A$12.7 billion

Criteria #2: All Australian citizens must stay warm
* REWARD: here's some pink batts to put in your ceiling (just what I intended to get for Xmas!)
Cost: A$3.9 billion

Criteria #3: All schools must spend $200,000 on maintenance
* OPTIONS: repair holes in Detention Room doors and walls; remove graffiti; service vending machines.
Cost: A$1.9 billion

Wow, I never knew spending money could be this hard! Really is there any skill required to announce a $42 billion spending spree in one day? An ATM could have handed out the money in a more thoughtful way to passes by. If the ATM runs out of money, just fill it up with more printed cash (from the Government's blank check book...).


$42 billion to support 90,000 jobs

The package is supposed to support jobs - 90,000 of them. Lets see, 42bn divided by 90K = $466,666.67. Nearly half a million dollars per job to "support" insulation installers, builders, and of course Armaguard security officers (need more people to keep those ATMs full).

A lot of money to sort out the winners from the losers (losers of cause being the working taxpayer).

I was hoping there would be a few billion handed out to "support" the Australian wine industry. It's just been through its worst export year in 15 years (by value and volume). If only every working taxpayer was given a dozen of bottles of shiraz in the mail. Maybe it will come out in the budget :). Maybe he will introduce a "wine-o tax" (alla "alco-pop" tax) for the industry instead.


Temporary Deficit

Despite the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, saying it would be a "temporary deficit'', today's mini-budget reveals the nation's finances will be in the red for at least the next four years with the accumulated deficit of $118 billion (almost identical to the $115 billion that has been wiped from expected tax collections from companies, individuals and the GST).

The Australian Government will now be deep in the red for at least the next four years with an accumulated deficit of $118 billion.

The Prime Minister and Treasurer claim the deficit will be temporary. It’s all rhetoric. Circumstances will get worse. The stimulus packages are short-sighted and will only provide short-term economic “activity”.

There is no plan for long-term job creation.

There is no exit strategy to get out of deficit (there are no large assets left to sell (like Telstra) to repay debts).

Expect a third attempt to stimulate the economy come the budget on 5 May 2009. Least there might be some money which will be thrown at productive assets (bail out State obligations to upgrade ports, railway hubs etc)

Chart 1: From a $20 bn surplus to a $20 bn deficit in two year.
source: ABC news 2/2/09

Chart 2: Put it on the credit card please
source: ABC news 3/2/09

The deficit projections will blow out more as the year progresses. Even more worrying, how much will the Government devalue the purchasing power of the Australian Dollar by the end of 2009?

The Opposition

The opposition isn't much better than the Government. To date, I would give the Rudd Government ½ star out of 10, and the opposition 1 star. They are reading the same book but on a different page. They are both viewing the world from the book of Keynesian economics.

Opposition comments on the $42 billion package:

Malcolm Turnbull:

So far, the Opposition Leader, Malcolm Turnbull appears to be more interested in wedge politics.

He responded this morning and explained why the Coalition will block the $42 billion economic stimulus package. Turnbull proclaimed that the package was so big "it looked like panic".

Turnbull still, however, supports the need for a type of stimulus. He wants tax cuts, rather than targeted one off hand outs. In my opinion, tax cuts will not fix the structural problems of Australia and the world monetary system.

Turnbull quotes from today:
"Someone has to stand up for fiscal discipline."

The Federal Government's plan would mean borrowing $70 billion over the next four years, an act that would increase national debt to $200 billion.

"That is a $9500 debt for every Australian, a debt our children will have to pay off years into the future"

"It is an insult to taxpayers"

Peter Costello:
(Tuesday 3/2/09 on Lateline)

"It's poor quality spending"

"Spending should create long term production, create long term new jobs"

"The budget has gone from a $20 bn surplus to a deficit. Not because revenues have fallen. This deficit is driven by policy decisions. $28 billion of policy decisions."

One former politician has actually given this some thought...

Paul Keating:

On Monday night, just before the Prime Minister released the $42 billion stimulus package, former ALP Prime Minister, Paul Keating gave a frank interview on ABC's Lateline program >here<.

Keating appears to be the only political figure in Australia which has actually put some thought into the problems we face from the financial crisis. He cites some major strucutural reforms must be persued, and that the United States no longer has any economic bargaining power to bring to the table.

Here is some of what Keating discussed:

"Expansion of credit running for 60 years. This is the first time 2008, 2009 where we've had a contraction of credit.

What we need is a completely new global political and economic settlement.

Be rid of the old IMF.

Be rid of the old G7.

Bring the surplus countries into the political framework. G7 is made up of all debtor nations. There are no surplus countries.

We need a totally new Bretton Woods Agreement.

The United States cannot reflate the world. .. but they will try to reflate their way out.

You will start to see in the price of gold, if this goes on for a couple more years, the serious question of an American default. A default by the United States treasury.

Until we get a true settlement, where the great states like India and China, and their big economies and the surplus countries like Russia, the oil countries in the middle east, get a greater say…Until we get to a representative world structural of power. That is global political and global financial power, then that’s the only way confidence will really return to the system. This can't be done by the Americans.

On Kev's 7000 word "social capitalism" essay:
We should not get too ideological about it. In the end rational policy is always good.

On Kev's attack on Neo-Liberals:

When Keating was pressed if he identified himself as a neo-liberal, his answer was
"Absolutely".

Future for both major parties

The days for soaring popularity for both major political parties are numbered. We will hit recession. Unemployment will rise. Housing prices will fall. All debts must be accounted for. Inflation will start hitting food and rents more. M0 money supply will increase sharply, while M3 money supply will contract (as property prices fall in Australia).

The political party which wakes up first and stops reading from the book of Keynesian economics and realises that a new monetary framework is required, will do better in the long-run. Perhaps a new political force will come before either party reinvents themselves.

Invest your $950

The best thing you can do (in my opinion only), is either use the handout to repay high interest bearing debts (credit cards, car loans) or save it.

Through the saving option – avoid saving cash. The Australian dollar will continue to diminish in purchasing power (vs tangible items). ie. $950 in Australian dollars might have $850 purchasing power by years end.

On the flip side if $950 were saved for real money, that is, gold and silver, your savings will increase in purchasing power going forward. I will be investing in the shadow monetary system. Think long term. The more citizens with gold and silver, the less capacity government will have in the future to try and print its way out of the black whole. Governments cannot print a nation into great wealth, just ask Zimbabwe.

Cheers
Scott