Showing posts with label Paul Keating. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Keating. Show all posts

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Superannuation wake up call - markets do not always work for the better good

People around the world are slowly waking up. Politicians and the financial industry have been perpetually lying to us about our retirement future.

In the US this first became abundantly clear in 2008 with the collapse of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Lehmann Brothers and AiG and more recently with the smoke and mirrors game over US national debt. Likewise in Europe, the ongoing myriad of debt is rising to the surface exposing the vulnerability of sovereign nations to a poorly designed monetary system controlled by an international banking cartel which lies outside the nation's political systems. Whether Europe and the US continue to monetise debt and expose more debts, or embrace so called spending cut measures (austerity), the current monetary/economic systems will fall apart regardless. The point of no return was well over a decade ago. This point cannot be understated and it will have severe implications for everyone's every day lives, and expected future retirement years.

In Australia, the spin machine of politicians (on both sides of the fence) has perpetually endorsed the need for compulsory superannuation to fund individuals’ retirement needs. The biggest furphy of all is that “markets on average always go up” and that the Superannuation system will always work. A quick glance at one’s recent Super statement suggests otherwise. For several years I have had an agonistic view of the compulsory Superannuation system. The system is fatally flawed as it is heavily tied to the fortunes of the sharemarket, which itself is heavily influenced by changes in age demographics, major booms and busts brought about from a global debt-based monetary system and speculative malinvestments.

It was no coincidence that major changes were made to superannuation arrangements in the early 1990s, when Paul Keating introduced the "Superannuation Guarantee" in 1992 (or compulsory superannuation for individuals). The political class knew they needed to act quickly to transfer the responsibility of one’s retirement from employers (and ultimately the Commonwealth Government through old age pensions) to individuals, as by 2025 one-in-five Australian’s would be over the age of 65.

What better time for the Government to introduce a compulsory retirement “savings” system, than to do it when the largest demographic, the baby boomer generation, were half way through their working careers – there would be at least another 15 years of compulsory contributions to help prop up the Australian sharemarket.

After more than a decade of compulsory contributions, Australian workers have now amassed over $1.28 trillion in superannuation assets. Australians now have more money invested in managed funds per capita than any other economy. Sadly, markets are prone to huge swings, and people will have to revise their superannuation retirement expectations markedly - and act to preserve what they have.

As Alan Kohler stated in his article of 15 August 2011, Stranded at super’s ground zero
The aim of retirement incomes policy in Australia for two decades has been to shift the burden of risk to individuals before the next big bear market hit. It
worked quite nicely. …

Kohler further explains:
The first fifteen years since the superannuation guarantee legislation was first introduced in 1992 went extremely well. The compound annual rate of return provided by the sharemarket – like manna from heaven – was 15.5 per cent.

And Australia was, and still is, overweight equities. That is, the proportion of our retirement savings invested in shares is about the highest in the world. The OECD average is for about half to be invested in fixed interest; in Australia that’s 10-20 per cent.

If we take a quick snapshot of the sharemarket and annualised returns for the last five years are now sitting at a big - ZERO.

The reality is that the 1990s was a period of excessive credit creation across the Western World. All big booms, end in big busts, and the 90s boom gave us the NASDAQ (dot.com) bubble and bust, and later the massive real estate boom and bust in Europe and the US (and soon to be China and Australia). The superannuation system relies on a worldwide debt-based monetary system with perpetual money creation and debt rollover to function. What we aren’t told is that expansion of the monetary system erodes our purchasing power, creates inflation (cost of living pressures) and misallocates capital and labour to non-productive industries and pet projects.

The other fact is that the “compulsory” element to superannuation in Australia is inflationary by nature. With the Government forcing employers to provide 9 per cent pay, by law, into a super fund, there is a continual inflow of extra money entering the sharemarket system every year, regardless of the current state of the economy or the mood of the sharemarket. In a bull market, super funds, as a substantial proportion of market participants, compete with other buyers in the market, which ultimately leads to higher and higher share prices. In bear markets, the Super funds continue to buy companies in the S&P indexes regardless of poor market or company fundamentals (including companies with suppressed share prices due to large capital raisings to raise liquidity).

The biggest problem of all, is the finance industry itself. Whether the market goes up, down or sideways, the fund managers collect their annual fees and commissions for doing next to no monitoring of your portfolio. They get billions of dollars of inflows into their industry regardless of economic conditions, which ultimately props up the financial industry than what would otherwise be the case. The Government in effect is intervening in the market in a huge way, nurturing bad economic habits by providing the industry with lots of capital it may otherwise not have had. As a result, bad behaviours have grown over time. Parts of the financial community (particularly investment bankers) have used more and more "financial wizardry" to make particular investments more attractive (such as infrastructure assets) and more leveraged. However the catch is that all the bad money gets flushed out of the market system at some point in the future. The future cannot be permanently bought through debt (monetary promises).

Percy Allan’s recent article of 14 September 2011, Bucking the bear market, suggests that things may well get worse and stay bad for many years to come. His studies indicate that the world is stuck in a secular bear market. Secular bear markets is a period of typically 15 to 25 years of major volatility, of large upswings, and several primary bear markets. For instance, between 1965 and 1981 (as seen in Chart 1)there were four primary bear markets in the US, displaying falls from peak to trough of 25 per cent to 45 per cent.

Chart 1: Secular bear markets example

Chart 2: 100 years showing major secular bull and bear trends

Chart 3: The typical phases of a secular bear market. We are in phase 3.

Chart 4: Secular bull vs secular bear markets


The next secular bull market my not begin until 2015 – 2021


A “buy and hold” strategy (or some say a “hope and pray” strategy), which is continually flouted by the financial industry and Government can be disastrous for investor share portfolios (including superannuation) during secular bear markets. Many investors and now many superannuation accounts are spending a great deal of energy trying to recover from previous losses. What if the next four to ten years continues to be a secular bear market? Could you wait until 2021 for the major volatility swings to end?

Allen states that “the Great Depression, like the global financial crisis was the product of excess debt which had to be expunged before a bull market resume”. The 1929 bust for instance resulted in secular bear market that didn’t end until the debt deleveraging was over. Does anyone seriously believe, at this point in time, that the hundreds of trillions of dollars worth of Government debt (from the US, to Europe to China) and banking debt could magically disappear within 10 years?

There are always profitable trading opportunities for those willing to look and manage the risk. Capital preservation should be the primary goal for any trader, particular in this secular bear market. Timing is everything and those traders who have their finger on the pulse of the market, could generate substantial return from the market swings. A mechanical (non-emotive) trading plan is absolutely essential should you dabble in the market, at any stage of a secular bull or bear market.

The Government needs compulsory Superannuation

Yet another reason why compulsory superannuation is a giant rort in Australia, is the excessive taxation place on it. In FY2011 the Australian Government collected $7.1 billion in superannuation taxes, not bad from a “compulsory” system the Government itself setup (expected to rise to $12.8bn in four years time). The Government also uses lots of other calculations and methodologies to manipulate individuals financial decisions when it comes to retirement. The Government’s aim is to keep people in the workforce longer. The perseveration age is being incrementally lifted so that by 2025, no one will be able to access “their” superannuation until the age of 60. Why should the Government decide this for you? Would you wait to 60 years age if these access restrictions weren't there?


So what is the alternative?


What if the advice of your financial planner, accountants, stockbrokers over the decades ended up being totally off mark at the point of retirement or during retirement? There is no backspace button to turn back time.

The alternative is to take responsibility for your own financial decisions, and be sceptical about all the financial advise thrown around. If we invest TIME into financial education about how markets work, investment opportunities and threats become a lot more visible. Further, a basic understanding of monetary history is an absolute must (particularly precious metals). Currency (or money substitutes) isn’t the most preferred form of money in certain times and debt systems which produce big governments do not always work out for the better. We need to understand what happens to markets during transitionary periods. Monetary systems typically only last 40 years and the last change was in 1971 - so its overdue to change again. The US-reserve currency system, and the Euro will not last for many more years in their current form. All fiat currencies are A new monetary system will emerge. Will your savings be tied to the old system or the next system?

For superannuation, diversification to reduce exposure away from the sharemarket is a must - asap. If you are 100% relying on Superannuation to work by the time you retire and throughout your retirement, you are not diversified from the major ups and downs from the market at all. By diversification I mean different assets classes such as exposure to gold and silver and cash. (Not diversification between banking shares and mining shares – all shares are susceptible to the major market swings). Gold and silver have both easily outperformed the world sharemarkets and all currencies for the past decade, and this is highly likely to continue for the next decade. Gold and silver in the hand has no liability (debt promise) to anyone and is a hedge against the Government and banking inflation-machine.

Self-managed superannuation will gain in popularity as more individuals take the responsibility of retirement from the financial industry back to where it belongs, in the home. Recently in August 2011, it was reported that self-managed superannuation grew by $3 billion in three months (7,500 new accounts).

I would also be inclined to think twice before taking any Government-induced incentives before throwing money into your compulsory super account (such as the superannuation co-contribution scheme). Would you make this decision without the Government offer on the table? If not, why should the Government incentive change your actions?

One needs to change their context on investing and have a light bulb moment where your context on the economy changes. The vast majority of people are still thinking about investing with a 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s mentality. The next decade will be very different. Always remember that the market does not care if you gain or loose money!, so you must take ownership of your money and do it as soon as possible.

Alan Moir Cartoon - this is how your super works

Southpark's take on the finance industry:


Cheers
Scott

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Automatic Teller Man

Stimulus Package Attempt #2

Yesterday the Australian Government released details of a second stimulus package to the tune of A$42 billion dollars.

Summary:
• $14.7b for schools - $200,000 each
• $6.6b for 20,000 new homes
• $3.9b to insulate 2.7m homes
• $890m for road repairs and infrastructure
• $2.7b small business tax break
• $12.7b for cash bonuses of up to $950

Kevin Rudd – the human ATM
First there was FuelWatch, then FoodWatch - now introducing... ATM-Watch!

Kevin's criteria to stimulate the economy:

Criteria #1: You must be an Australian Citizen
* REWARD: $950 per person (cause you should feel good about being an Aussie!)
Cost: A$12.7 billion

Criteria #2: All Australian citizens must stay warm
* REWARD: here's some pink batts to put in your ceiling (just what I intended to get for Xmas!)
Cost: A$3.9 billion

Criteria #3: All schools must spend $200,000 on maintenance
* OPTIONS: repair holes in Detention Room doors and walls; remove graffiti; service vending machines.
Cost: A$1.9 billion

Wow, I never knew spending money could be this hard! Really is there any skill required to announce a $42 billion spending spree in one day? An ATM could have handed out the money in a more thoughtful way to passes by. If the ATM runs out of money, just fill it up with more printed cash (from the Government's blank check book...).


$42 billion to support 90,000 jobs

The package is supposed to support jobs - 90,000 of them. Lets see, 42bn divided by 90K = $466,666.67. Nearly half a million dollars per job to "support" insulation installers, builders, and of course Armaguard security officers (need more people to keep those ATMs full).

A lot of money to sort out the winners from the losers (losers of cause being the working taxpayer).

I was hoping there would be a few billion handed out to "support" the Australian wine industry. It's just been through its worst export year in 15 years (by value and volume). If only every working taxpayer was given a dozen of bottles of shiraz in the mail. Maybe it will come out in the budget :). Maybe he will introduce a "wine-o tax" (alla "alco-pop" tax) for the industry instead.


Temporary Deficit

Despite the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, saying it would be a "temporary deficit'', today's mini-budget reveals the nation's finances will be in the red for at least the next four years with the accumulated deficit of $118 billion (almost identical to the $115 billion that has been wiped from expected tax collections from companies, individuals and the GST).

The Australian Government will now be deep in the red for at least the next four years with an accumulated deficit of $118 billion.

The Prime Minister and Treasurer claim the deficit will be temporary. It’s all rhetoric. Circumstances will get worse. The stimulus packages are short-sighted and will only provide short-term economic “activity”.

There is no plan for long-term job creation.

There is no exit strategy to get out of deficit (there are no large assets left to sell (like Telstra) to repay debts).

Expect a third attempt to stimulate the economy come the budget on 5 May 2009. Least there might be some money which will be thrown at productive assets (bail out State obligations to upgrade ports, railway hubs etc)

Chart 1: From a $20 bn surplus to a $20 bn deficit in two year.
source: ABC news 2/2/09

Chart 2: Put it on the credit card please
source: ABC news 3/2/09

The deficit projections will blow out more as the year progresses. Even more worrying, how much will the Government devalue the purchasing power of the Australian Dollar by the end of 2009?

The Opposition

The opposition isn't much better than the Government. To date, I would give the Rudd Government ½ star out of 10, and the opposition 1 star. They are reading the same book but on a different page. They are both viewing the world from the book of Keynesian economics.

Opposition comments on the $42 billion package:

Malcolm Turnbull:

So far, the Opposition Leader, Malcolm Turnbull appears to be more interested in wedge politics.

He responded this morning and explained why the Coalition will block the $42 billion economic stimulus package. Turnbull proclaimed that the package was so big "it looked like panic".

Turnbull still, however, supports the need for a type of stimulus. He wants tax cuts, rather than targeted one off hand outs. In my opinion, tax cuts will not fix the structural problems of Australia and the world monetary system.

Turnbull quotes from today:
"Someone has to stand up for fiscal discipline."

The Federal Government's plan would mean borrowing $70 billion over the next four years, an act that would increase national debt to $200 billion.

"That is a $9500 debt for every Australian, a debt our children will have to pay off years into the future"

"It is an insult to taxpayers"

Peter Costello:
(Tuesday 3/2/09 on Lateline)

"It's poor quality spending"

"Spending should create long term production, create long term new jobs"

"The budget has gone from a $20 bn surplus to a deficit. Not because revenues have fallen. This deficit is driven by policy decisions. $28 billion of policy decisions."

One former politician has actually given this some thought...

Paul Keating:

On Monday night, just before the Prime Minister released the $42 billion stimulus package, former ALP Prime Minister, Paul Keating gave a frank interview on ABC's Lateline program >here<.

Keating appears to be the only political figure in Australia which has actually put some thought into the problems we face from the financial crisis. He cites some major strucutural reforms must be persued, and that the United States no longer has any economic bargaining power to bring to the table.

Here is some of what Keating discussed:

"Expansion of credit running for 60 years. This is the first time 2008, 2009 where we've had a contraction of credit.

What we need is a completely new global political and economic settlement.

Be rid of the old IMF.

Be rid of the old G7.

Bring the surplus countries into the political framework. G7 is made up of all debtor nations. There are no surplus countries.

We need a totally new Bretton Woods Agreement.

The United States cannot reflate the world. .. but they will try to reflate their way out.

You will start to see in the price of gold, if this goes on for a couple more years, the serious question of an American default. A default by the United States treasury.

Until we get a true settlement, where the great states like India and China, and their big economies and the surplus countries like Russia, the oil countries in the middle east, get a greater say…Until we get to a representative world structural of power. That is global political and global financial power, then that’s the only way confidence will really return to the system. This can't be done by the Americans.

On Kev's 7000 word "social capitalism" essay:
We should not get too ideological about it. In the end rational policy is always good.

On Kev's attack on Neo-Liberals:

When Keating was pressed if he identified himself as a neo-liberal, his answer was
"Absolutely".

Future for both major parties

The days for soaring popularity for both major political parties are numbered. We will hit recession. Unemployment will rise. Housing prices will fall. All debts must be accounted for. Inflation will start hitting food and rents more. M0 money supply will increase sharply, while M3 money supply will contract (as property prices fall in Australia).

The political party which wakes up first and stops reading from the book of Keynesian economics and realises that a new monetary framework is required, will do better in the long-run. Perhaps a new political force will come before either party reinvents themselves.

Invest your $950

The best thing you can do (in my opinion only), is either use the handout to repay high interest bearing debts (credit cards, car loans) or save it.

Through the saving option – avoid saving cash. The Australian dollar will continue to diminish in purchasing power (vs tangible items). ie. $950 in Australian dollars might have $850 purchasing power by years end.

On the flip side if $950 were saved for real money, that is, gold and silver, your savings will increase in purchasing power going forward. I will be investing in the shadow monetary system. Think long term. The more citizens with gold and silver, the less capacity government will have in the future to try and print its way out of the black whole. Governments cannot print a nation into great wealth, just ask Zimbabwe.

Cheers
Scott