Commodities Update - March 2010

Just some quick charts this time

Chart : Copper


Chart : Nickel


Chart : Zinc


Chart : Aluminium


Chart : Baltic Dry Index (BDI)


Chart : Iron Ore

Source: ABC News, March 10

Chart : Coal

Source: ABC News, March 10

The Houdini Economy

I believe there are many, many parallels in the world economy today, to that of previous economic depressions. We need only to look at past history. However, historian's all have different accounts and points of view. Is historical information based on objective analysis, primary evidence or a biased second hand account?

Is the economic events of today so different to that of the past? We are constantly told we are living through the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression; then we are told Australia has a resilient economy and that we are weathering the storm. Surely it can't happen to us?

"But we live in a modern, innovative, high-tech society today!"

In the 1920s America - the "Roaring Twenties", the sharemarket was booming, the humble car was built for the masses (T-Model Fords), and the population was extremely opportunistic. The population had never felt so wealthy, the horse and buggy were essentially gone from urban areas and the economy had never been more innovative. It seemed the good times would always last.

And today? We live in the so-called "new economy". A modern, innovative, high tech economy. We have never felt wealthier. We expect the good times to always get better. The next 20 years will be better then the last 20 years.

These are two different points in history - but the same human traits of economic complacency are well and truly alive today. There is usually a large economic depression every 75 years - the average life span of a human. Is it a coincidence economic lessons repeat? Is it a coincidence that each generation since the 'silent' generation (of the 1920s and 30s) has progressively had worse money habits than their parents generation? Everything used to be bought within our means, today its on credit, and we have little incentive to save for a raining day.

Houdini economy

** The big difference between 1929 and today, I believe, is the acceptance of mis-information by the general public and an acceptance to think the monetary system will always work. We live in the so called "Information Age", yet our diluted statistics mean we live in a Houdini economy. It's all smoke and mirrors. Government's have an interest to keeping the public unaware about what is really happening in the economy - to maintain political and social stability (in the short run).

However, comparing today to the past has become distorted because economists, Governments, and the media think they are comparing apples to apples. Today, statistics are treated as gospel. We believe that the stats on the nightly news are accurate, objective and unbiased. Why are we not learning from recent events? Many of the economists and bankers who got it wrong, are still in positions of power and influence. Central banks are being given expanded powers (particularly the Fed Reserve), rather than face increased accountability.

More often than not, an economic number today will be grossly diluted to that of 75 years ago. For example, the unemployment rate, or level of inflation are grossly misunderstated today.

For instance why is unemployment so low at the moment? In the 1930s it got to 32 per cent in Australia! Yet it is still around 5 per cent today, despite a recession and economic turmoil worldwide.

Answer: The ABS counts people as been employed if they are working just 1 hour per week.

But as the following chart shows, the number of hours worked has been falling gradually in the last 15 years. For starters there are a lot more part time jobs. It's good for people who want to work less, but its bad for recording what the real unemployment rate should be.

Chart 1:
Source: Kohler, ABC News

Getting back on topic - lets compare further to the last Great Depression:

1929 to 1932- the greatest sharemarket crash in history put the world into a Great Depression. In 3 years the market fell 89 per cent.

Current sharemarket crash? Depends on your measuring stick, namely, the monetary system has changed. 1929 money was backed by gold. Today it is backed by an exponential curve of debt.

If we use the Dow/Gold Ratio (which is what the 1929 sharemarket crash was recorded against), then the current bear market we have today really started in 1999 (not 2007). So far from top to bottom of the bear market the Dow Jones has fallen 84 percent measured against gold (the old monetary unit).

Perhaps we are already in economic depression but we just aren't awake to it?

As the following chart shows, the inflated US Dollars of today have diluted the impact of what is really happening. From 1999 to 2007 the Dow Jones rose in nominal terms, while the old monetary system was showing the economy was sick (and crashing), now both these measuring sticks are showing the US and world economy is continuing to tank.

Chart 2: Dow Jones over last 100 years
Wow - look at the 1929 crash! It's huge. What this chart fails to show is that important change of the monetary rule book in 1971 (when the gold link was removed).

The following chart puts the 1929 crash, and today's sharemarket crash into a better perspective (apples vs apples).

Chart 3: 100 yeas Dow/Gold Ratio.
Source: Steve Hickel, gold-eagle.com

The last dip in Dow/Gold Ratio:

Notice has taken at least 32 years to reach a new peak in the Dow/Gold Ratio in the last two downturns. In the last downturn there was stagflation in the 1970s, a change of the monetary rulebook in 1971, a commodity price peak in 1982, and an increase in social security outlays of Governments among other things. There was no great depression, but inflation was accepted and new bubbles came along to occupy everyone's money. The key last time is that there remained confidence in the new fiat monetary system. I believe this time round will be different.

Clearly there is a huge difference between Chart 2 and Chart 3. Chart 2 is an inflation drive chart. Chart 2 characters a true free market which goes from undervalued to overvalued and back over time. (Change the monetary system (methodology), and you will change the shapes of the charts!)

Steel industry today vs 1920s

Lets compare 1920s and today even further...

In the 1920s, there was a huge boom in the United States steel industry. 15 per cent of steel was used in automotive manufacturing. By 1928 there was over 21 million cars, enough for 1 in every 6 Americans. When the Great Depression hit however, by the mid 1930s over 50 per cent of the United States steel capacity stood idle.

Today there is vast amounts of steel capacity standing idle also. Lets compare.

Kingdom of Rust

According to latest research from Macquarie Bank, there is some 362 million tonnes per annum of unutilised steel capacity in the world.

Chart 3: Today, around 25 per cent of the world's steel capacity is sitting idle.
Source: Macarthur Coal Presentation - 17 June 2009

To put this into perspective, this is equivalent to:
- every single steel mill in Europe, Japan and Korea shutting down OR/
- ¾ of China’s steel production closing down.

With all this recent iron ore hype in the Australian sharemarket (in the last couple of months), just stop for one moment and envisage 3 out of every 4 steel mills in China closing down. Only the lowest cost (lowest debt) iron ore, coking coal, steel producers could survive a sustained turn down. Clearly there is too much capacity worldwide. This is not unique to just the steel/iron ore industries. The capacity for most goods today is built on the premise that the current monetary system will continue to work, that the world economy will continue to expand at a rapid rate, and that our tolerance of debt will continue to expand.

All this extra capacity will have to be removed from the system. Many companies will continue to go under. This is only natural. In the boom times too much competition led to cheaper cars and airfares, and even steel was pre-fabricated in China and exported back to Australia! There needs to be a giant shake-out across industry worldwide. Give it a few years..

Baltic Dry Index

Much of the gains on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) in recent months have been on the back of a bounce in commodity prices (ie. A fall in the US Dollar), and increased shipping movements out of China for Australian iron ore and coal. This has also lifted the Baltic Dry Index (BDI), which had a major crash in 2008. The BDI is a daily number published by the Baltic Exchange – it tracks world wide international shipping prices for dry bulk cargoes such as iron ore. It shot up in the boom years, and crashed big time last year as the following chart demonstrates.

Chart 4: Baltic Dry Index crashed 94 percent when the resources boom bust, its now rebounded on growing Chinese iron stockpiles.
Source: Bloomberg

The following chart from Alan Kohler pictures an interesting relationship between the BDI and movements in the Australian and US Dollar. Positive movements in commodity prices (particular in US terms) and the BDI - is a positive force for the Australian sharemarket.

Chart 5: Baltic vs AUD
Source: Kohler, ABC News

I believe its now time for the BDI to fall sharply once again. The third quarter of the calendar year is traditionally the worse for commodity prices (from my experience, particularly in base metals). Apparently about 10 per cent of the world Capesize ships (the largest) are sitting of Chinese ports, unable to unload their iron ore. The two largest iron ore terminals in China are said to be close to full capacity. Now that the 2009/10 iron ore benchmark prices have been finalised (with Japan and Korea), my bet is the Chinese have done most of their shopping for this year, and will try to manipulate the market in the short-run to really hammer down prices come next year.

World Trade

Ok, so i've talked about the BDI - what about world trade as a whole?

The following chart from Alan Kohler paints a bleak picture for world trade. It uses a base of 100 for the peak in world trade (some 12 months ago). Already we have gone from a massive boom, and the big bust continues at a greater magnitude than the 1929 trade bust. Just like the 1920s America – there is significant overcapacity in the world. Trade flows are stalling.

Chart 6: World trade has fallen off a cliff much higher then the Great Depression slump.Source: Kohler, ABC News

Covering up debt - back to the suitcase method

We all know what hiding bad debts can do... Subprime mortgage-backed securities, bundled together, given a AAA rating and sold overseas to unknowing investors worldwide. This grand scheme worked for a while... now it appears the humble suitcase is back in vogue to move Government debt around.

Here is a rather amusing article. If this were true... the US/Japanese Governments are running out of places to hide their debt!!

Suitcase With $134 Billion Puts Dollar on Edge

Two Japanese men are detained in Italy after allegedly attempting to take $134 billion worth of U.S. bonds over the border into Switzerland. ..

The trillions of dollars of debt the U.S. will issue in the next couple of years needs buyers. Attracting them will require making sure that existing ones aren’t losing faith in the U.S.’s ability to control the dollar. ..

Think about it: These two guys were carrying the gross domestic product of New Zealand or enough for three Beijing Olympics. If economies were for sale, the men could buy Slovakia and Croatia and have plenty left over for Mongolia or Cambodia. ..

Let’s assume for a moment that these U.S. bonds are real. That would make a mockery of Japanese Finance Minister Kaoru Yosano’s “absolutely unshakable” confidence in the credibility of the U.S. dollar. ..

Bad news can only be covered up for so long. Question everything!

Scott

Global Trade at Risk

The following is an article today from Alan Kohler. He and a few other commentators were talking about this issue a couple of weeks ago. It appears to have worsen significantly, and yet it doesn't even pop up on the nightly news or the front of main stream newspapers.

Kohler's articles can be viewed daily at: http://www.businessspectator.com.au

The global shipping crash continues to get worse and this morning’s GDP data shows the US recession is already deeper than 2001 and probably 1990-91 as well.

Meanwhile the International Monetary Fund seems determined to make the whole thing worse by imposing the most ruinous strictures on supplicant nations.

Yesterday the Baltic Dry freight rate index fell below 1000 for the first time in six years and last night it fell another 40 points to 885. In June the index was 11,900, so it has fallen 93 per cent in a few months – a crash far worse than anything ever seen in the stockmarket.

The spot daily rental for a Capesize ship is now $6365, down from $234,000 per day over the space of a few weeks. Maybe that previous price was absurdly inflated, but at $6365 it is just $365 above the average daily cost of crews and fuel.

As a result the world’s ports are filling with empty ships because shipowners can’t afford to run them, as well as some full ships because the owners of the cargo won’t unload without a bank letter of credit, which banks are refusing to supply.

Shipping companies are starting to file for bankruptcy in increasing numbers as they breach loan covenants, and a shipping researcher, Andreas Vergottis of Tufton Oceanic has told Bloomberg that a fifth of the world’s dry bulk companies may soon have negative net worth because the market for second hand ships has collapsed and the value of their fleets is below outstanding debt.

Like property-based loan agreements, shipping companies’ debt covenants have loan to value ratios that are typically 70 per cent. As the value of their fleets decline, banks are making margin calls.

Meanwhile, as expected, US GDP fell in the September quarter – by 0.3 per cent. The only reason it wasn’t worse was government spending, which added 1.1 per cent to the rate of GDP change. There was another 0.6 per cent from private inventories – that is, unsold goods.

In any case, US economic data is always rushed out quickly, based on guesswork, and then revised later. Most of the guesses in this morning’s figure look optimistic, so it is very likely to be revised downwards.

Even on this morning’s optimistic estimate, it is the first year-on-year decline in GDP since 1991, so this recession is already worse than 2001 and clearly has a long way to go.

And remember that in 1990-91 – and 1980 and 1973 and 1961 for that matter – the monetary and fiscal authorities were more or less in control. Or rather – they started it.

Those recessions were caused by central bank and government efforts to control inflation. This time it’s all about a spontaneous collapse in private sector credit and governments around the world are desperately trying to counteract its effects with interest rate cuts, liquidity injections and fiscal stimulus.

That is…all except the IMF. It is imposing the most horrendous conditions on bailout loans to bankrupt countries.

As the rest of the world’s official interest rates come down, Iceland’s this week went up 6 per cent, from 12 to 18 per cent, as a condition of its $US2 billion rescue package.

Hungary, Serbia, Belarus, Pakistan and Ukraine are now facing the most excruciating choice: default on their debts or ask the IMF for money at the expense of crushing their economies under the weight of a massive increase in interest rates.

As Ambrose Evans-Pritchard writes in last night's London Telegraph: “A deflationary strategy of this kind could prove counterproductive – or worse – if applied in enough countries simultaneously. It would defeat a key purpose of the rescues, which is to stabilise the global financial system.”

Meanwhile China, the world’s greatest creditor nation, is now cutting interest rates as its economy slows.

The emerging world in general has “recoupled” (if it was ever decoupled) and the removal of hedge fund investments in their currencies, government debt and sharemarkets will, in many cases, result in deeper recessions in those countries that in the US – where it all started.

Which is why global shipping has collapsed: it is the harbinger of the end of the era of trade, in which third-world labour costs kept first world inflation down and allowed interest rates to fall and stay low and debt to be increased to an historic degree.

That process of importing deflation (or, more precisely, disinflation) from developing nations – especially China and India – relied on trade: raw materials in; finished goods out.

The fall in freight rates for both dry bulk carriers and container ships is telling us that it’s over.

Australia is potentially in the most vulnerable position. Commodities could potentially be on the brink of collapse if ships do not start to move soon. Already we are currently witnessing Mount Gibson Iron (MGX.ax) in a trading suspension because China will not/cannot move its ships to buy MGX's iron ore. MGX is by no means a small Australian company. It is in the ASX100, and would be in the top 20 resource companies in Australia.

The fallout of a huge resources bust is almost unthinkable. A few zinc mines have shut (or reduced output) over the last few months in Australia. Now at current spot prices, even OZ Minerals Century Mine (formally Zinifex) near Mt Isa, the 2nd largest zinc mine in the world, is unprofitable at current prices. Commodity prices need to rebound quickly along with ship movements, or Australia will enter deep recession within a year. Commodities make up around 60% of Australia's exports, and it is no coincidence that the Australian Dollar has fallen by 40% in only a couple of months!

Picture this: A truck driver working in a mine in the Pilbara earning over A$100,000 p.a. suddenly looses his job because the mine shuts down. Only a year earlier he took out a mortgage on a new house in Perth. However, 100,000s of other people are in the same situation. Mines closing, exports decreasing. Australia hits recession and there are few jobs. The miner, who expected to maintain employment and a high income is suddenly unable to pay the monthly mortgage with no solid income. Property prices across Australia then start falling sharply on weak buyer demand and falling expectations.

This is a real possible situation which may hit Australia soon if the resources boom comes to a grinding halt which is increasingly looking more likely.

Scott